Laurel House

Words Inform. Actions Demonstrate. Patterns Reveal.

Understand the relationship behind the decision.

Laurel House · Relationships and Romance Scams Expert · Behavioral Dynamics Researcher
Laurel House presenting at the National Center for Victims of Crime National Training Institute, Chicago, September 2026
A bank statement shows that money moved. It does not show the months of conversation that made a promise credible, the future someone believed they were building, or what happened when they questioned the person asking.
My presentations bring audiences inside those missing details. Drawing on more than 15 years of professional relationship work, lived experience, research, and continuing graduate education, I examine how connection develops, how trust is used, and how people make decisions within relationships.
For professional audiences, that perspective supports closer attention to disclosure, communication, autonomy, and the relationship surrounding exploitation. For broader audiences, it offers recognizable language for intimacy, compatibility, boundaries, and recurring behavior.

They lived it forward. You received it backward.

When a completed case is presented, the outcome tells the audience which details matter. The person living the relationship did not have that advantage.
My case-based presentations introduce information progressively. Participants consider the decisions available at each stage before learning what happened next. We examine what was known, what remained uncertain, what explanation had been offered, and how trust shaped the next choice.
The discussion moves from “How could they believe that?” to questions that help establish how the relationship worked and what a useful response might require.
SPEAKING

Presentation topics

Select a topic to read the description, audience takeaways, and intended audiences.
Inside the Romance ScamHow trust becomes access—and why recognition can be complicated.

An examination of the relationship surrounding financial deception: credibility, intimacy, future promises, requests, contradictions, and continued investment. Participants consider how emotional attachment and practical decisions interact, including why evidence of fraud may not immediately resolve belief in the relationship.

Audience takeaways: Reconstruct the trust-building process; distinguish early uncertainty from information learned later; identify questions that explore relationship context without blame.

Designed for: Victim services, financial institutions, prosecutors, investigative teams, and professional conferences.

Ghost Flags: Before the Meaning Is ClearWhat color is a red flag before you know it is a red flag?

An early inconsistency may appear minor, understandable, or unrelated to other events. Its significance can become clearer only as information accumulates. This presentation examines how to notice and document those moments without treating every contradiction as proof of manipulation or assuming the person already knew what became apparent later.

Audience takeaways: Separate observation from interpretation; examine repetition and context; ask more precise questions about early shifts.

Designed for: Advocates, professional teams, universities, and public audiences.

Intimacy Pathways to Love and DeceptionHow the experience of connection can develop into reciprocity—or be used for leverage.

This presentation introduces my framework for examining how intimacy and trust develop, how a person becomes emotionally invested, and how that investment can be exploited. We examine recognizable changes: attention that creates an expectation of access, shared purpose that becomes obligation, or reassurance that becomes conditional on compliance.

Audience takeaways: Distinguish this framework from the five Intimacy Types; examine what behavior accomplishes over time; recognize the importance of autonomy, reciprocity, and context.

Designed for: Relationship professionals, victim services, universities, and organizations addressing exploitation.

The NO Test: What Happens When Someone Disagrees?Examining autonomy through responses to boundaries.

A relationship provides information when someone asks a question, changes their mind, declines a request, or makes an independent decision. This presentation examines the response and its consequences: discussion, pressure, withdrawal of affection, blame, intimidation, or punishment.

Audience takeaways: Look beyond the stated intention; examine repeated responses and consequences; use existing events to understand autonomy without encouraging unsafe confrontation.

Designed for: Public audiences, advocates, educational settings, and relationship professionals.

#iTrusted: Disclosure Without BlameTrusting someone should not become the thing you have to defend after they deceive you.

An examination of how professionals and families respond when someone discloses romance fraud or remains involved after concerns have been raised. We consider shame, secrecy, attachment, family frustration, and questions that preserve an opportunity for further disclosure.

Audience takeaways: Identify blaming assumptions; ask about promises, requests, and responses to questioning; consider how communication can affect willingness to remain engaged with support.

Designed for: Victim advocates, banks, prosecutors, investigators, community organizations, and family education programs.

Relationship Intelligence: Connection That Works in Real LifeCompatibility, intimacy, readiness, and the behavior behind the promise.

Drawing on my coaching, eharmony work, and E3 Relationship Intelligence role, this presentation examines what people need to understand about themselves and each other as relationships develop. Topics include the five Intimacy Types, values, partner selection, communication, and the difference between an apology and sustained repair.

Audience takeaways: Identify how connection is experienced; examine readiness and recurring choices; translate abstract relationship preferences into observable behavior.

Designed for: Public events, relationship-focused organizations, universities, and community audiences.

Words Inform. Actions Demonstrate. Patterns Reveal.
FEATURED PRESENTATION

2026 National Training Institute

National Center for Victims of Crime · Chicago · September 2026

Romantic Exploitation & the Rise of RomCons: Reclassifying Victims of Emotional, Financial, and Identity-Based Theft — From Silence to #iTrusted

I developed and delivered an interactive session examining trust-building, romantic exploitation, financial deception, shame, and barriers to reporting. Using progressive case disclosure and my own lived experience, the session placed participants inside the information available at different stages of the relationship.
The presentation introduced practical questions and concepts including Ghost Flags, the NO Test, and #iTrusted, with attention to how the relationship shaped decisions and how professionals interpret those decisions afterward.
Laurel House speaking at the National Center for Victims of Crime National Training Institute, Chicago, 2026

Formats and customization

Inquiries are welcome for conference presentations, keynote-style talks, interactive workshops, organizational staff education, moderated conversations, and university guest sessions. Sessions can be discussed for in-person or virtual delivery.
A focused 60–90-minute session can introduce the core concepts and a case discussion. Longer workshops, multi-session education, and recorded training require a separately agreed scope. Content, duration, and availability are confirmed for each engagement.
SPEAKING + TRAINING INQUIRIES

Book a conversation about your audience

Tell me who will attend, what they encounter in their work, the questions you want addressed, and your proposed date and format. Include your organization, location or virtual platform, audience size, and budget if available.
Scroll to Top